The Misconception of Inclusion and Liberal Ideology

The term 'liberalism' often carries with it a complex set of ideals and beliefs. Among these, one of the core tenets is the duty of inclusion. However, many observers and critics argue that the liberal narrative on inclusion can be misleading and sometimes hypocritical. This article aims to explore the nuances of this debate, focusing on the apparent exclusion of certain groups, particularly whites, from some liberal discourses.

The Inclusion and Exclusion Dilemma

Many critics of liberal thought argue that the term 'liberalism' is often used in a way that excludes specific segments of the population, particularly whites. For example, some claim that when liberals use the term 'diversity,' it can be perceived as a coded message to reduce the influence and representation of white people. This concept often leads to discussions about the genetic and psychological traits that are attributed to certain groups.

Psychological and Genetic Perspectives

Some critics argue that the liberal obsession with diversity can be linked to psychological or even genetic factors. It has been suggested that there is a 'genetic disorder' characterized by the Dopamine Receptor Gene (DRD4), which supposedly causes impulsive and emotional decision-making without rationality. Critics link this to phenomena such as 'Trump derangement syndrome,' a colloquial term used to describe the mental state of college students who became radicalized against the former President, showing how their beliefs might be influenced by emotional impulsiveness rather than rational reasoning.

The Role of Education

Another crucial factor in the liberal discourse on inclusion is the role of education. Critics argue that liberal indoctrination in both K-12 and higher education systems significantly shapes young minds to rebel against traditional values. This indoctrination often emphasizes a rejection of American values and institutions, which are seen as the foundation of the modern world. The result is a sense of eroding national identity and an increasing divide between generations.

Reconsidering the Concept of Inclusion

The concept of 'inclusion' as championed by liberals can be viewed through a critical lens. If the goal is to create a more diverse and equitable society, this approach often fails to include key components, such as white men and women who possess traditional values and morals. Critics argue that the inclusion rhetoric sometimes becomes a tool for exclusion, particularly by marginalizing these groups.

Conclusion: Towards a More Balanced Dialogue

The debate around liberal inclusion is complex and multifaceted. While the goals of promoting diversity and inclusion are laudable, it is essential to ensure that all segments of society feel included and valued. A balanced approach is necessary to avoid the pitfalls of polarization and ensure that traditional values and individual rights are respected. Moving forward, it is crucial for all to engage in open and honest dialogue to find common ground and build a more inclusive society.

Keywords: Inclusion, Liberal Ideology, Diversity, Racism, Criticism