Jakarta to IKN: A Shifting Capital in Indonesia’s Future
The capital relocation from Jakarta to the Indonesia Convention Exhibition (IKN) in East Kalimantan marks a significant shift in the political landscape of Indonesia. While many are concerned about the impact on Jakarta, it is important to dive into the reasons behind this decision and its broader implications for the country's urban development and stability.
The Melting Pot of Indonesia
Indonesia, often referred to as a melting pot, has been a central hub for political, racial, ethical, cultural, and religious interactions. Jakarta, in particular, has been the epitome of this melting pot, functioning as the center of numerous ideologies and struggles, reaching a seemingly harmonious balance. However, the capital's relocation does not signal a complete dismantling of Jakarta's role—it merely signifies a partial shift.
Strategic Divide and Conquer
The decision to move the central government to IKN, while leaving a significant portion of Jakarta intact, is seen as a strategic move. The government intends to 'divide and conquer' by maintaining the economic and cultural vibrancy of Jakarta while decentralizing power. This approach aims to promote balanced regional development and reduce the strain on Jakarta's infrastructure, ensuring a more sustainable and equitable future for the nation.
Indonesia Without Jakarta or Other Cities
It is often asked what would happen if cities like Jakarta, Aceh, Pontianak, Bengkulu, Palu, or Ternate were to fall. The answer is that Indonesia would indeed be less complete without any of these cities. Each plays a unique role in the nation's socio-economic fabric. For instance, Jakarta serves as the economic engine, while Yogyakarta and Bukittinggi have played pivotal roles in the political and resistance movements of the past. Their loss would signify a significant blow to the nation's identity and strength.
Substitute Capitals: Surabaya as a Future Option
Should any unforeseeable catastrophe destroy Jakarta, Surabaya remains as a strong contender to take over as the substitute capital. Surabaya, already a major urban center, has the necessary infrastructure and economic might to support a central government. In a worst-case scenario, it would serve as a viable fallback plan, ensuring continuity of governance and national stability.
Conclusion
The decision to move the capital from Jakarta to IKN is a strategic move towards a more balanced and sustainable governance model for Indonesia. While it may not be a complete replacement, it is a necessary step towards reducing the overburden on Jakarta and promoting regional development. The resilient and proud spirit of the Indonesian people ensures that no single city holds all the power, as each province plays a vital role in the nation's strength and unity.