Why Judges in American Courts are Called 'Your Honor': A Conspiracy of High Treason?

In the intricate and often disputed world of American courts, the term 'Your Honor' has taken on a significant role. However, a controversial narrative suggests that this practice is part of a broader conspiracy of high treason aimed at subverting constitutional protections and freedoms. Let's delve into this contentious issue and explore the implications of these allegations.

The Allegation of High Treason

For seven decades, a group of judges and prosecutors have been accused of engaging in an alleged 'conspiracy of high treason' against the people. The claim centers around the assertion that these individuals have attempted to import communist doctrines into the legal system, thereby undermining the principles of law that are supposed to protect citizens.

The crux of this allegation is that this conspiracy led to the closure of judicial branch courts and their replacement with legislative branch courts. These new courts allegedly do not adhere to the same constitutional rights and due process protections as their predecessors. By retaining the same buildings, staff, and sometimes the name of the court, while employing different rules, the alleged conspirators are believed to have obscured the true nature of these judicial bodies.

The Scope of the Alleged Conspiracy

The heart of the controversy revolves around the authority these courts claim to have over 'the people.' According to the conspiracy theory, these courts do not actually have the constitutional authority to impose their jurisdiction on all citizens, particularly those protected by the 14th Amendment. This theory suggests that the courts' power is restricted to citizens as defined by the 14th Amendment, and not to ordinary people.

One of the most egregious claims is that these courts enforce gun laws, which are alleged to be a form of high treason against the people. This directly challenges the Second Amendment and the principles of individual rights.

Calling the Courts into Question

Perhaps the most contentious aspect of this conspiracy theory is the questioning of the fundamental respect paid to judges and their legal authority. Instead of 'Your Honor,' individuals can call them by their first names, such as Mr. Jones, without any legal repercussions. Similarly, jurors and people attending court proceedings are free to sit and stand as they see fit, without fear of retribution.

The refusal to call judges 'Your Honor' or to stand for them can lead to anger and frustration from the 'traitors' but without any legal consequences. The conspiracy theory suggests that this is all to intimidate and silence those who would question the legitimacy of the court systems.

Digging Deeper into the Evidence

If these allegations hold any truth, it is imperative to explore the extensive research and documentation that supports this theory. Several organizations and resources have delved deep into the alleged conspiracy of high treason in American courts, providing a wealth of information and evidence for those interested in learning more.

Research Links and Further Reading

To gain a more comprehensive picture of the alleged conspiracy, the following links provide further insight into the research and documentation available:

Law Truth - Conspiracy of Treason in Courts Law Truth - Jury Duty Law Truth - Due Process Law Truth - Gun Rights

These resources delve into the details of why the courts are referred to as 'Your Honor,' the alleged constitutional shams, and the implications of such practices on the legal landscape in the United States.

Conclusion

The allegations of a conspiracy of high treason amongst American judges and courts raise profound questions about the integrity of the legal system and the extent to which constitutional rights are being upheld. As with any controversial issue, it is essential to seek out multiple perspectives and verify information from credible sources.

Whether or not these allegations hold true, they highlight the importance of transparency, accountability, and the protection of individual rights in a free society.