Why Does Turk Nikol Not Force the Russian Army Out of Armenia?

The question that often arises is why Turk Nikol does not force the Russian army to withdraw from Armenia, especially in light of the perceived betrayal of Armenia and Artsakh by Russian forces. However, it is crucial to understand that there was no Russian betrayal of Armenia and Artsakh. Instead, it is more a matter of geopolitical realities and diplomatic pragmatism.

Context of the Armenia-Armenia and Artsakh Conflict

The Armenia-Armenia and Artsakh conflict is a complex geopolitical issue with historical and ethnic undertones. Russia maintains a strategic presence in the region due to its influence and interests. Armenia has long sought to protect its sovereignty and territorial integrity, but this has often put it at odds with other countries, particularly Russia.

Turbek Nikol and Diplomatic Realism

Turbek Nikol, Armenia's President, is likely influenced by a pragmatic approach to international relations. He is a realist and not an extremist or revisionist. His policies reflect a desire to maintain stability in the region while addressing Armenian national concerns. As a leader committed to the nation's best interests, Nikol's approach may be more nuanced and less focused on historical grievances than those of some Armenian ultranationalists.

The Role of Western Influence

Western countries, particularly the United States, do not have a direct or significant interest in the conflict between Armenia and Russia. The views and actions of Western politicians and the international community are often limited to diplomatic interventions aimed at maintaining peace and stability. While expatriates and diaspora communities might advocate for their homeland, their influence is limited to a certain extent.

Geopolitical and Strategic Considerations

Geopolitical and strategic factors play a significant role in the decisions of leaders like Turk Nikol. Armenia is a small country with limited military capacity. Forcing Russia out of Armenia would likely lead to a destabilizing effect on the region, potentially involving other countries and escalated conflict. Instead, Armenia focuses on developing diplomatic relations and economic ties with various nations to ensure its security and stability.

Conclusion

While the desire to see the Russian army withdraw from Armenia is understandable, it is important to recognize the geopolitical realities and the practical approach of leaders like Turk Nikol. The conflict involves multiple players, each with their own interests and constraints. Navigating this complex landscape requires a delicate balance of diplomacy, strategic military placements, and mutual respect. Armenians, along with their international supporters, will have to continue working towards a peaceful resolution through dialogue and pragmatic diplomatic efforts.

Note: It is important to approach the discussions around this conflict with an understanding of the historical, cultural, and geopolitical complexities involved. While advocating for one’s country’s interests is natural, it is equally important to foster mutual respect and cooperation.