Why Diversity Efforts Target White-Native Countries: A Critical Analysis
Diversity Efforts: A Misapprehended Agenda
The push for diversity, especially in countries like Japan, demonstrates a bias that highlights the hypocrisy often associated with such initiatives. Woke activists from the West, particularly America and Europe, repeatedly advocate for increased diversity in Japan. Yet, it is clear that the Japanese government and society are smarter, recognizing the societal harm caused by diversity in places like the USA and Europe. The current impetus for diversity is built on a logical fallacy, with its true intentions being far more insidious than mere inclusivity.
The Logical Fallacy of Diversity Advocacy
The core of diversity advocacy is grounded in a misleading premise that trivializes real issues. Advocates often present diversity as a noble cause, yet their objectives are driven by much darker motivations. This pseudo-inclusivity serves as a facade for more sinister goals. Sadly, many individuals, often self-absorbed and morally bankrupt, cling to such rhetoric, believing it makes them appear morally upright without actually caring about the underlying issues.
Misguided Beliefs and Their Origins
As an Old White Straight sexually, Right-Wing Conservative, I believe one of the most egregious crimes committed by white immigrants and settlers in lands predominantly non-white was the imposition of their religions. Communities like Africans, Native American Indians, Hindus, Muslims, and Volcano worshipers lived harmoniously, believing in their respective deities. However, missionaries unknowingly disrupted traditional social structures, causing anger and resentment among these communities. The East India Company and British government faced such backlash and were even pressured to ban missionaries.
The Role of Governments and Corporations
The perception of a country’s diversity often hinges on the actions of its government and corporations. While the term "country" can refer to both governments and people, it often means the dominant government. Government policies encouraging immigration, particularly from non-white populations, are done for economic benefits. Increased tax revenue and GDP growth act as incentives. Additionally, corporations, driven by the expansion of markets, also support such policies. However, these governments often act contrary to the will of their people, leading to significant dissatisfaction.
Consequences of Economic Overreach
The primary reason for the rejection of white-majority governments is the stark disconnect between the interests of these governments and the desires of the people. Policies that prioritize economic growth over societal well-being exacerbate this divide. The result is a widespread distrust and rejection of the current political systems, marking a significant shift in public sentiment.
Conclusion
The push for diversity in white-majority countries reflects a broader issue of governmental and corporate priorities that often disregard the well-being of their citizens. The rhetoric of diversity is a complicated narrative, masking deeper economic and political motivations. Understanding these complexities is crucial for fostering genuine inclusivity and addressing the true needs of society.