Why Bars are Closed but Liquor Stores Remain Open During the Pandemic

The current pandemic has affected various businesses, with many classified as essential and non-essential. Among the non-essential businesses that have been largely shut down are bars. However, liquor stores have been allowed to remain open. This raises the question: Why is this the case?

Bars and Liquor Stores in the Time of Pandemic

Bars have ceased operations due to the risk of virus transmission. The nature of bars, where people gather in close proximity to socialize and consume alcohol, poses a significant threat to public health. Drunk patrons in bars often find it challenging to maintain social distancing, making it difficult to adhere to safety protocols.

On the other hand, liquor stores have been permitted to continue operating, although with measures such as curbside pickup and online delivery. These establishments serve as a source of various alcohol products that can be safely consumed at home, where social distancing is easier to maintain.

The Difference in Operations

Unlike bars, liquor stores enable consumers to purchase their products while keeping a safe distance. For instance, customers can select items from a display, pay via contactless methods, and pick up their purchases without lingering. Some even offer delivery services, further minimizing contact and reducing the risk of spreading the virus.

Another insight is that liquor stores maintain a much smaller customer flow than bars, making it easier to adhere to safety guidelines. It is evident that the differences in how these businesses operate significantly contribute to why liquor stores have been allowed to remain open.

Avoiding Alcohol Withdrawal and the Importance of Liquor Stores

Some have suggested that liquor stores remain open due to their role in preventing alcohol withdrawal symptoms. Liquor stores dispense a drug necessary to prevent these dangerous symptoms, particularly for those who are recovering from addiction. While not all customers share this dependency, the availability of such products is essential for those in need.

Moreover, liquor stores do not require patrons to linger, as purchasing and leaving quickly is common. In contrast, bars often see drunks who may be more prone to breaking safety protocols and engaging in risky behavior. The distinction in customer behavior and the environment of these establishments further justifies the differential treatment of bars and liquor stores.

Why Lockdown Rules Should Not Restrict Home Consumption

It is noteworthy that during the pandemic, many people are turning to home consumption, such as ordering takeout, playing online games, and enjoying beverages in the safety of their homes. This shift is understandable, given the health and safety concerns associated with going out in public.

However, proposing restrictions on home consumption, such as limiting the right to have a drink at home, would be met with significant public backlash. The government must ensure that such measures are communicated clearly and have a well-substantiated rationale. Any attempt to infringe on the ability to have a drink in one’s own home, especially to manage stress during lockdown, can lead to widespread dissatisfaction and unrest.

The UK, for example, has seen compliance with lockdown measures with minimal protests. Still, the government runs the risk of losing public trust if it disregards the well-being and emotional needs of its citizens. It is crucial to strike a balance between public health and individual rights.

Conclusion

The decision to close bars while allowing liquor stores to operate during the pandemic reflects the differing approaches businesses take to ensure public safety. Bars, where large numbers gather in close proximity, pose a higher risk of virus transmission. In contrast, liquor stores facilitate safe purchases and home consumption. Understanding these differences is crucial for implementing effective public health measures while respecting the needs and rights of the general public.