The Debate on Immigration and Border Security in the United States
The debate on immigration in the United States has been a contentious topic for many years. This issue is multifaceted, involving national security, economic benefits, and social policies. At the heart of the discussion lies the question of whether the US should continue to allow new immigration or if it should close its border to new applicants.
Current Immigration Policies
A significant portion of the debate centers around the current immigration policies. It is important to clarify that the border is not “open” or “closed” but rather that it is managed with both legal and illegal immigration in mind. All who apply for residency and pay the required fees undergo a thorough screening process, which includes background checks, interviews, fingerprinting, and photography.
Not all who attempt to enter the US are processed in the same way. Those who attempt to enter illegally and are caught by border patrol or customs agents are returned with a record of their attempt. Screening applies to all individuals, including US citizens, resident aliens, legitimate business people, students, visiting professors, and temporary workers. These individuals bring billions of dollars annually to the US economy and contribute significantly to cultural exchanges and tourism.
Border Security and Legal Framework
The current legal framework for immigration and border security has been in place since 1951, with modifications in 1986. This includes the legal process for asylum-seekers, who must apply from within the US and cannot do so from another country. They are interviewed at the border and may undergo further hearings before a judge, or they can be refused entry.
The process and legal framework have been consistently maintained, even under administrations as diverse as Bush, Obama, and Biden. Bush and Obama both pushed for tighter border security, reforming temporary worker permits and asylum laws. However, these efforts faced resistance from Republican lawmakers, who refused to support these reforms, highlighting the complex political landscape surrounding immigration policy.
Security Concerns and Cartel Influence
A significant concern in the debate revolves around the security of the border and the influence of drug cartels. In 1985, the DEA agent Kiki Camarena was kidnapped, tortured, and killed by drug cartels. These cartels, which continue to operate, fund drug trafficking across the border. This has led to a call for stricter border controls to prevent the drug trade and illegal immigration.
Some argue that closing the border is necessary to address the threat posed by illegal immigration and the presence of drug cartels. However, others, represented by figures like “Carpetbagger Joey,” advocate against such measures. They argue that increasing the number of illegal aliens in the US census can skew electoral votes in favor of liberal candidates. This, they believe, is part of a larger strategy to reshape the US political landscape.
The ultimate end goal, as some perceive it, is a more liberal, potentially communist America controlled from the “SWAMP,” a term often used to describe the Washington political establishment. Critics argue that such a narrative/questions the integrity and motives of those who advocate for stricter border controls, framing it as a political ploy rather than a genuine concern for national security.
Overall, the debate on immigration and border security in the US is complex and multifaceted. It involves both legal and illegal immigration, national security concerns, and the socio-economic impact on the country. As the discussion continues, it is crucial to understand the various perspectives and the legal framework in place to inform informed and balanced opinions.