Scotland's Independence: A New Beginning and Its Potential Name
The topic of Scotland leaving the United Kingdom (UK) has been a matter of intense discussion and debate for many years. If Scotland were to become an independent nation, several questions arise, one of which is the name they would choose to adopt. This article explores the potential changes and considerations if Scotland were to leave the UK and become a new country.
Scotland's Long History
Scotland, as a historical entity, dates back to 843 AD. It has been a part of a larger UK for centuries, but there are growing leanings toward independence. The prospect of becoming an independent country raises the question of what Scotland should call itself post-independence. Many might argue that simply continuing to call the new nation 'Scotland' would be the most straightforward solution.
Potential Name for the New Nation
If Scotland were to leave the UK and become an independent nation, the logical name would likely remain 'Scotland.' However, in light of the recent push for independence, there has been some consideration of changing the name. The moniker 'Republic of Scotland' might be suggested by some, particularly if there is a shift away from constitutional monarchy to a republic. Yet, as of now, 'Scotland' seems the most likely candidate for the name.
Geographical and Cultural Context
It's worth noting that the name 'British' would still be applicable to people from all four nations of the UK—England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and Scotland—since they all reside on the same island. The term 'British' remains associated with the larger geographical entity, not necessarily with the political union that may dissolve. The United Kingdom would continue to exist without Scotland, retaining its name and referring to the remaining three nations.
Reasons for Independence
Many Scots are fed up with paying billions into the Westminster exchequer without enjoying the same level of investment in their own services and infrastructure. There has been a growing sentiment that the UK government, particularly the English elements, have been neglectful or even exploitative in their relationship with Scotland. This has led to frustration and calls for independence. Some English people also believe in unionist propaganda that Scotland is a drain on the economy, but this is not substantiated by the evidence.
Economic Strength of Scotland
Despite the political and emotional arguments, Scotland has significant economic strength. Here are some of the key assets:
65 UK Offshore Oil and Gas
￡10 Billion/annum Petroleum product exports
70 UK Fish Landings
90 UK Hydro Electricity
65 UK Timber Production
25 Potential UK Renewable Energy
25-30 Potential EU Tidal Resources
65 UK Maritime Area
Food and drink: ￡14 Billion/annum
Growing Industry in Life Sciences, Computer Gaming, Forestry, and Tourism
In 1997, William Waldegrave, UK Finance Minister, admitted in the UK Parliament that Scotland had paid at least ￡27 Billion into the Exchequer more than she received. Ref. Hansard!
With ~8 of the UK population, Scotland provided ~13 of the casualties in Two World Wars, so in that respect, we've more than paid our dues.
Recently, the UK stole 5000 Square Miles of Scottish Waters, no doubt in an attempt to extend their North Sea Borders and therefore their share of Scotland's Oil and Gas!
Conclusion
The idea of Scotland leaving the UK and becoming an independent nation is fraught with political, cultural, and economic challenges. While the name 'Scotland' is the most likely choice, the journey to independence would require a comprehensive reassessment of governance, economy, and identity. As discussions continue, one thing is clear: the repercussions of a Scottish independence would be significant and long-lasting, affecting not just Scotland but the entire United Kingdom.