Post-Audit Database Recovery: Maricopa Election Officials Face Scrutiny
The recent recovery of the deleted database after an AZ audit has reignited concerns about election integrity. The timing of the deletion – just before sending the equipment for audit – is highly suspicious and raises serious questions.
Security Concerns and Criminal Charges
The Maricopa election officials have expressed being “scared s---less” due to the deletion of the files. This action not only jeopardizes the integrity of the audit process but also opens the door for severe criminal charges. The risk of tampering with election records is too high to ignore.
Access and Security Breaches
The deletion of the entire drive of files raises significant questions regarding how anyone gained access to the system. This breach in security is alarming and suggests a deeper issue with the protection mechanisms in place. Furthermore, the passwords are in possession of a single individual, which is a serious security risk.
Adjudication Files and Evidence
Several adjudication files were deleted, including those that contain crucial information. Arizona, like Georgia, Michigan, and Nevada, had an unusually high number of adjudications. These files have the potential to reveal vote switching activities, which is a contentious issue in the election integrity community.
Evidence and Corruption Suspicions
Given the timing and the critical nature of the deleted files, the assumption among election integrity activists is that these files might contain evidence of vote switching. The deletion could be an attempt to hide incriminating evidence. However, without access to these files, the true intent and outcome remain unknown.
Evaluation of the Audit Company’s Credentials
There are several aspects that have raised doubts about the credibility and impartiality of the audit company. Allegations suggest that the audit company is not non-partisan and is run by a pro-Trump conspiracy theorist. Additionally, the use of blue and black pens by the people counting, as opposed to the legally mandated red pens, could indicate a attempt to alter ballots.
The Motive Behind the Controversy
Some claim that this audit is simply a PR stunt aimed at boosting the ego of Trump and his supporters. The company conducting the audit is not an official recount and has no legal bearing on the final results, all of which bring into question the legitimacy of the entire process.
In conclusion, the deletion of the database and the subsequent audit process highlight the ongoing issues with election integrity. Transparency, impartiality, and security are paramount in upholding the trust and integrity of our electoral systems.
Stay informed and seek out reliable sources to make an informed decision.