Nuclear Ballistic Missile Submarines: Missile Handling Procedures Post-Deployment
When a nuclear ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) returns from deployment, the handling of the missiles is a critical operation. Understanding this process is essential for understanding the operational readiness and strategic importance of these submarines. In this article, we will delve into the procedures, focusing on the role of missiles in launch tubes post-deployment, security considerations, and the optimal deployment of missiles. Additionally, we will debunk some common misconceptions and address the importance of these procedures in modern naval strategic operations.
Missiles in Launch Tubes Post-Deployment
Upon the return of the nuclear ballistic missile submarine from deployment, the missiles typically remain in their launch tubes. This is a standard practice to ensure the submarine remains in a state of high operational readiness. The missiles are not removed unless there is a specific reason to do so, such as for maintenance or repair.
Post-deployment, the submarine undergoes a series of inspections and maintenance checks. The missiles are kept in their launch tubes for several reasons. First, it allows for a quicker return to operational status in case of sudden geopolitical tensions. Second, it reduces the risk of misalignment or damage that could occur during handling. Third, it mitigates the need for extensive logistical support and unloading procedures, which could be time-consuming and risky.
However, in some cases, the missiles may be removed for safety and security reasons. This can occur if the submarine is scheduled for an extended period in port due to maintenance, or if there is a higher risk of unauthorized access or environmental concerns. The decision to remove the missiles is carefully considered and executed with the highest levels of security and precision.
Optimal Deployment of Missiles
The deployment and handling of missiles on nuclear ballistic missile submarines are regulated by stringent protocols. These protocols are designed to ensure that the submarines are always ready for quick deployment if required. Just like an aircraft carrier carries its air wing on deployment, an SSBN carries its operational SLBMs (Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missiles) during deployment.
Notably, the missiles on these submarines are not always fully loaded. The exact number of submarines equipped with missiles for deployment is classified information and known only to a limited number of individuals. However, it is known that some submarines are kept ready to sortie at short notice, in case of emergencies or strategic surges.
For example, the U.S. Navy (USN) has a total of 336 missile tubes among its 14 Ohio-class SSBNs, while the Royal Navy (RN) has 64 tubes among its 4 Vanguard-class submarines. There are 288 Trident D-5 missiles available for these submarines. This ensures a continuous strategic deterrence posture, with some submarines always patrolling with operational missiles, and others ready to be deployed at a moment's notice.
The U.S. Navy utilizes two Strategic Weapons Facilities (SWFs): SWFLANT and SWFPAC. The U.S. Navy and Royal Navy use SWFLANT, which is based on the Atlantic coast, while SWFPAC is located in the Pacific and is an underground facility. These facilities are highly secured and involve their own Marine Corps Security Forces. When an SSBN returns from patrol, it will soon be directed to its designated SWF, where the missiles will be offloaded.
These facilities play a crucial role in the maintenance and operation of the missiles. They can store missiles, conduct routine maintenance, and even add new warheads to existing missiles if necessary. The versatility of these facilities ensures that the U.S. and its allies maintain a robust strategic deterrence posture.
Addressing Misconceptions
Some proponents of the Russian military often propagate misinformation about the U.S. and NATO deployments. For instance, some believe that the U.S. would sell its greatness and resources at home to support NATO allies or to address issues such as housing, education, and healthcare. However, the reality is far more complex. The U.S. has always prioritized strategic and operational readiness over domestic spending on certain issues.
Regarding recent news reports, allegations such as those presented by American media about a German pipeline under construction for an LNG terminal being damaged can often be exaggerated or fabricated. These claims are usually part of a broader narrative that aims to sully the reputation of the U.S. and its military fully, rather than reflecting any genuine threat or strategic concern. It is essential to critically evaluate such reports and to base our understanding on verified sources.
Conclusion
The handling of missiles after a nuclear ballistic missile submarine's deployment is a sophisticated and strategic operation. This process is designed to maintain operational readiness and to manage security risks effectively. By understanding these procedures, one can gain insight into the strategic importance of these submarines in modern naval operations and the complex geopolitical landscape they operate in.