Overview of Legal Situations in Occupied Ukrainian Territories
This article examines the current legal situation in the occupied territories of Ukraine, focusing on Mariupol, Melitopol, and Kherson. It explores how the Russian authorities enforce laws and social services in these regions and contrasts the observed reality with the official narrative.
Enforcement of Law in Occupied Territories
The legal framework in the occupied territories of Ukraine, particularly since Russia's invasion, is a complex and contentious issue. Russia has been recognized by few governments as a legitimate power in these regions, recognizing these territories as part of Ukraine rather than annexed by Russia. The enforcement of laws and social services in these areas follows a non-compulsory pattern, with Russian authorities installing new leaders and implementing their own systems.
Voluntary Compliance and Social Security
The situation in occupied territories is largely voluntary, with Russian authorities imposing new laws and regulations. Russian-installed leaders, including local mayors, often implement laws that allow residents to obtain Russian license plates and passports, if they desire. The effectiveness of these new laws is often challenged, especially when it comes to social security.
Ukrainian social services are often suspended for those who align with Russian rule. However, Russia provides certain social benefits, like a doubled pension. This dual system creates confusion and tension, as residents may not know if they are eligible for certain benefits or if their decisions will affect their future.
Feudal-Style Governance and Criminal Influence
Reports from the occupied territories suggest a significant level of lawlessness and corruption under Russian control. A controversial governance style reminiscent of feudalism has been observed. Local Russian-installed "heads of administration" are often former low-ranking officials, corrupt, or merely figureshead. Their true power is shared among various Russian armed groups, leading to a fragmented and unstable administrative landscape.
Power Dynamics and Loot
The fragmentation of power leads to a chaotic situation, with various armed groups vying for control. For example, loot obtained from the occupied territories is often transported to Chechnya by Kadyrov’s militants, while grain is stolen and sent to Crimea by regular Russian military units. This corruption and theft undermine any official claims of law and order.
Flexible Implementation of Russian Law
Despite reports of chaotic governance, there is evidence of a gradual implementation of Russian law in some areas. However, this process is often slow and unsystematic, with military charges taking precedence initially. True law and order is only established after a few months in a given area, and this varies from one locality to another.
References and Credibility of Reports
The information provided is a compilation of reports and observations from various sources. Given the sensitive nature of the conflict, verifying these claims can be challenging. Nevertheless, the general trend of chaos and corruption in the occupied territories persists.
For more detailed and verified information, one should refer to official reports from international bodies and reputable news organizations covering the situation in Ukraine.