Evaluating the Election Integrity: Debunking Claims and Understanding the 2024 Race
The ongoing discussion surrounding the legitimacy of recent and past U.S. elections often centers around the idea that Democrats, such as President Biden, should have 'stolen' the election in 2024, just as some claim they did in 2020. However, a closer look at the events, electoral processes, and claims reveals a nuanced picture that cannot be easily characterized as theft or fraud.
Understanding the Subjunctive and Indicative
It is important to distinguish between the use of subjunctive and indicative forms in English, which can sometimes cause confusion. In your initial query, the subjunctive form 'were' is used to express a hypothetical scenario, often followed by an indicative form of the verb. For example, 'If he were to steal the election, why didn't he do it in 2024 when he was president?' In this case, the use of 'were' suggests a hypothetical situation, while the indicative form 'was' refers to a past reality.
What Happened in 2024?
The 2024 U.S. election saw a different landscape compared to 2020. One significant difference was that the Democrats and the Biden administration did not heavily rely on the 'Covid card' as a means of influencing voter behavior. This was partly due to changes in public sentiment and a shift in election strategies. Additionally, the requirement for voter ID at polling stations in many states led to lower turnout among certain demographics, such as elderly cemetery residents, who may have found it more challenging to vote without proper IDs.
Election Interference Claims and Reality
While the 2020 election faced several claims of interference, primarily from Donald Trump, the 2024 campaign saw fewer such allegations. The ONLY individuals found guilty or under investigation for election interference were Donald Trump and his legal representative, Rudy Giuliani. It is crucial to note that these findings did not involve the Biden administration or President Biden himself. Instead, the focus was on Republican party members and their strategies.
Ethical Considerations and Electoral Reforms
The notion that the 2020 election was stolen is unsupported by factual evidence. However, there is a valid argument that the conduct of the election was illegal and unethical, which made it easier for critics to make such claims. The result was significant reforms in election procedures in many states, aimed at ensuring transparency and fairness. These reforms have likely made it more challenging for future elections to be perceived as fraudulent, as evidenced by the reduced emphasis on the 'Covid card' and other questionable tactics.
Strategic Differences in Campaigning
The transition from Donald Trump to President Biden and then on to Kamala Harris as the Democratic candidate in 2028 has brought changes in campaign strategy. Trump's campaign was particularly adept at using the 'Covid card,' social media, and legal challenges to influence public perception and election outcomes. In contrast, the Biden campaign and subsequent elections have shifted focus to different areas, such as health care, economic policy, and social issues, rather than relying on controversial topics like pandemics or mail-in voting.
For the 2024 election, Kamala Harris faced a different set of challenges and opportunities. Her platform and campaign strategies were crafted to address the changing political climate and voter preferences of 2024. The focus shifted from the tactics used in 2020 to a more data-driven and issue-focused approach.
Conclusion: The 2024 U.S. election saw changes in the landscape due to government reforms, campaign strategies, and voter behavior. Claims of election theft are not supported by factual evidence, and the focus on reform has likely made future elections more transparent and fair. Differences in campaigning and voter demographics suggest a more nuanced understanding of how elections function in the modern era.