Buckingham Palace Bombing: How Would the British React in 1940?

The Impact of German Bombing on Buckingham Palace

During World War 2, Buckingham Palace faced a perilous situation when it was bombed in September 1940. Despite the tragedy and destruction, King George VI and Queen Elizabeth (then known as the Duchess of York) remained in the palace to show solidarity with the citizens enduring the Blitz.

High explosive bombs struck the palace, but the royal couple stayed there, symbolizing their connection with the people. This decision was a testament to the resilience and solidarity of the British during a time when home life and personal tragedies weren't far from the surface.

Public and Royal Response to the Bombing

Keeping Calm and Carrying On

Upon reflection, one must consider what response the British public and the Royal Family would have had if they faced such a tragic event. The idea of keeping calm and carrying on resonates deeply. The King and Queen might have emphasized unity and national pride, possibly quoting phrases such as “God rest the King, long live the Queen and her Regent.”

Words would have been powerful tools to keep morale high, reminding citizens that in times of great adversity, it is crucial to stand together, no matter the circumstances. Their determination to remain in Buckingham Palace would have further reinforced this message.

Escalation of National Sentiment

Another possible reaction would be an escalation of national sentiment, moving from a state of 'somewhat miffed' to 'damn annoyed,' reflecting a heightened level of anger towards the enemy. This emotional shift would likely have propelled the war effort with renewed vigor, as the British public would have rallied behind the government and military, driven by a sense of vengeance and determination to see the enemy defeated.

The Monarchy's Role in National Crisis

Morally Righteous Reaction

The Royal Family would have continued to play a significant role, much like they did during the bombing of Buckingham Palace. If a member of the Royal Family had perished, another would have immediately taken their place, ensuring the continuity of the monarchy. However, as presented in the provided text, the death of the monarchy itself was not seen as a critical factor for the nation's survival.

The British people, already enraged by the destruction of their homes and the loss of loved ones, would likely have hardened their stance even more. The shock from such an event would serve as a catalyst for even greater determination to defeat Nazi Germany, without wavering in the face of such atrocities.

Impact on Queen Elizabeth II's Reign

In the case of King George VI's untimely death, Queen Elizabeth II would have ascended to the throne at a much younger age. Her official coronation, scheduled to take place soon after her accession, might have been delayed or held in a more subdued manner until after the war. The British people would have understood and supported this pragmatic approach, recognizing the necessity of focusing on the war effort over royal pageantry.

Conclusion

The bombing of Buckingham Palace was a powerful reminder of the resilience and unity of the British people during World War 2. By staying in the palace and continuing their duties, the King and Queen symbolized the country's endurance and patriotism. This event would have served as a further rallying point for the nation, reinforcing the idea that 'we can and must fight on.'