BJP's Double Stand on Cow Protection: A Misguided Policy or Necessary Tempersational Measure?
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has been at the forefront of the debate on cow protection policies in India, a stance that has raised eyebrows, particularly considering that India is ranked as the world's second-largest exporter of beef under BJP rule. This article delves into the complexities of this issue, examining the arguments for and against the BJP's current policy, and whether it constitutes a double stand in the realm of cattle protection.
The Struggle with Stray Animals
India faces a significant challenge in managing stray animals, be it cows, dogs, or cattle. It is not uncommon to see stray cattle roaming the streets, often a source of public nuisance and disease. Critics argue that the BJP should have implemented a comprehensive law banning beef consumption across the country immediately after assuming power. However, a closer look reveals that the issue is more nuanced.
A Critique of the BJP's Strategy
Although the BJP rhetorically emphasizes cow protection, their actual policy measures have fallen short of expectations. Prior to the BJP's governance, steps were taken to protect cows through various state-level laws and regulations, but these were often not implemented effectively. The failure to enact a nationwide ban on beef consumption immediately can be seen as a dereliction of duty.
Freedom of Choice and Constitutional Rights
Supporters of the BJP argue that the Constitution of India allows individuals to eat beef according to their beliefs, preventing a one-size-fits-all approach. As a Hindu myself, I believe in the freedom of choice. I am a vegetarian but respect others' choices to consume beef. It is crucial to recognize that while cow protection is a legitimate and important concern, it should not overshadow the constitutional right to freedom of choice.
Clarifying Misunderstandings on Beef Export
There is often a misunderstanding regarding beef export policies. When discussing beef export and import, it is important to distinguish between beef meat in general and meat from specific types of cattle. Cattle meat in India typically refers to buffalo and bull meat, as opposed to cows. India is predominantly the largest exporter of buffalo meat, not cow meat. Moreover, the beef export industry has been in operation long before the BJP came into power and is not a sudden phenomenon.
BJP's Stance on Cow Protection and Beef Export
According to the Constitution of India, cow protection is a state subject, and the BJP government's stand on unauthorized slaughterhouses is clear. The implementation of stringent laws against cow slaughter is a constitutional mandate that has been carried out by various state governments, including BJP-led ones, without any alterations. The BJP came to power with a mandate that included the protection of cows, and they have been consistent in their stance against cow slaughter. They are merely implementing a law that has been in existence long before their rule.
Historical Context: RSS's Bipolarity
The question of whether the BJP's current stance on beef aligns with their commitment to cow protection points to a broader issue within the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the ideological parent organization of the BJP. The RSS has a history of adopting bipartite or double standards, reflecting the complexity of their political philosophy. From the independence movement to contemporary debates, the RSS has often displayed a dual approach. This bipartism reflects a balance between communal and secular governance, a strategy that often prioritizes power over means.
Conclusion
The issue of cattle protection in India is inherently complex and requires a nuanced understanding. While the BJP's policy on beef export and cow protection may appear contradictory on the surface, it is often rooted in constitutional and historical contexts. The debate about cow protection and beef export in India should focus on a balanced approach that respects the constitutional rights of citizens and the cultural sensitivities of different communities.
As a society, we must strive for a consensus that recognizes the importance of both cow protection and the right of individuals to make their own choices regarding food. The path forward should be one of dialogue and understanding, rather than labeling or demonizing one another based on divergent views.